The purpose of this application note is to outline an automated extraction method utilizing the Atlantic® DVB SPE Disk and the Biotage automated and manual SPE solutions for the extraction of dioxins and furans in several water matrices. The first section will highlight the use of the Biotage® Horizon 5000 fully automated extraction system and the method used for this application. Additionally, there will be an Application Modification section that will highlight the use of the Biotage® Horizon 4790 (with data and discussion) and Biotage® VacMasterTM Disk for this application.
Dioxins are of great environmental concern due to their teratogenic, mutagenetic, and carcinogenic impact. These lipophilic compounds bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife and can have half-lives of up to 132 years. They are known to bind to sediment or suspended particles.
Extraction using a solid phase extraction (SPE) disk is advantageous for extraction sediment laden samples because traditional SPE using a cartridge requires two extraction processes; a filtration step to remove particulates before extraction of the water sample is required due to the small cross sectional area of the cartridge leading to clogging, then the filtered particulates endure a separate extraction step, such as Soxhlet extraction. Not only that, if liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is used, this can lead to formation of emulsions which can be difficult to break and may adversely affect the proper extraction of the particulate matter. The SPE disk extraction approach filters the particulates from the water sample on top of the disk while efficiently capturing the compounds of interest within the disk media. Prefilters are available but are not always required to filter the particulates from samples. The elution solvents delivered will effectively extract the dioxins and furans from the disk media while also extracting the compounds from the sediment on top of the disk.
|
Step |
Number of Samples |
Sample Volume (mL) |
Disk Type |
pH |
Prefilter |
Large Particulates |
Fine Particulates |
Sediment |
||||
|
DI (LCS) |
2 |
500 |
DVB |
2 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
||||
|
River Water |
6 |
500 |
DVB |
2 |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
||||
|
River Water |
2 |
300 |
DVB |
2 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
|
Wastewater |
2 |
500 |
DVB |
2 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
||||
|
Step
|
Select Solvent
|
Volume (mL) |
Purge (s) |
Vacuum
|
Saturate (s) |
Soak (s) |
Drain/Elute (s) |
Sample Delay (s) |
||||
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Methylene Chloride |
15 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
120 |
|
||||
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Acetone |
11 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
120 |
|
||||
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Methanol |
11 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
8 |
|
||||
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Reagent water |
15 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
|
||||
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Reagent water |
15 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
|
||||
|
Load Sample |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
45 |
||||
|
Air Dry Disk |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
600 |
|
||||
|
Elute Sample Container |
Acetone |
8 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
90 |
60 |
|
||||
|
Elute Sample Container |
Methylene Chloride |
8 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
90 |
60 |
|
||||
|
Elute Sample Container |
Methylene Chloride |
8 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
90 |
60 |
|
||||
|
Elute Sample Container |
Methylene Chloride |
8 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
90 |
60 |
|
||||
|
Elute Sample Container |
Methylene Chloride |
8 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
90 |
120 |
|
||||
|
Parameter |
Setting |
|---|---|
|
Cartridge |
DB5 (60m) |
|
Flow (mL/min) |
1.0 |
|
Sample Injection Volume (µL) |
1.8 |
|
Initial Cartridge Ramp |
180 °C to 190 °C at 2 °C/min |
|
Final Cartridge Ramp |
190 °C to 240 °C at 5 °C/min |
|
Total Run Time (min) |
52 |
Biotage LLC gratefully acknowledges the Carso Group France.
The tables below outline the results from each sample. Several different types of water samples were examined to see if significant differences in recovery were observed. Samples with suspended particles yielded higher recoveries (Table 6) than the LCS (Table 5) by a small amount. Table 7 shows results for samples with both particulate and sediment, providing an increasingly challenging matrix. The suspended particles and sediment in the bottle did lower the recoveries due to the compounds natural tendency to adhere to soil particles.
Wastewater influent samples, also a challenging matrix, were analysed and the results shown in (Table 8). Even in this matrix most of the compounds showed a reasonable recovery and good precision.
|
Step |
Solvent |
Soak Time (s) |
Dry Time (s) |
|
Prewet 1 |
Methylene Chloride |
60 |
60 |
|
Prewet 2 |
Acetone |
60 |
60 |
|
Prewet 3 |
Methanol |
60 |
4 |
|
Prewet 4 |
Reagent water |
5 |
2 |
|
Prewet 5 |
Reagent water |
0 |
0 |
|
Sample Process |
|
|
|
|
Air Dry |
|
|
300 |
|
Rinse 1 |
Acetone |
90 |
30 |
|
Rinse 2 |
Methylene Chloride |
90 |
30 |
|
Rinse 3 |
Methylene Chloride |
90 |
30 |
|
Rinse 4 |
Methylene Chloride |
90 |
30 |
|
Rinse 5 |
Methylene Chloride |
90 |
60 |
|
Compounds |
1 % Rec. |
2 % Rec. |
Avg. |
SD |
|
2,3,7,8-TCDF |
74.2 |
91.7 |
82.95 |
12.4 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF |
78.6 |
87.6 |
83.1 |
6.36 |
|
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF |
70.4 |
85.0 |
77.7 |
10.3 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF |
85.2 |
76.4 |
80.8 |
6.22 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF |
85.3 |
76.2 |
80.75 |
6.43 |
|
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF |
72.6 |
82.9 |
77.75 |
7.28 |
|
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF |
74.6 |
83.0 |
78.8 |
5.94 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF |
70.1 |
52.4 |
61.25 |
12.5 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF |
65.5 |
56.0 |
60.75 |
6.72 |
|
OCDF |
63.6 |
55.0 |
59.3 |
6.08 |
|
2,3,7,8-TCDD |
70.9 |
82.8 |
76.85 |
8.41 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD |
98.6 |
85.0 |
91.8 |
9.62 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD |
75.4 |
79.4 |
77.4 |
2.83 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD |
70.5 |
87.3 |
78.9 |
11.9 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD |
70.0 |
53.3 |
61.65 |
11.8 |
|
OCDD |
69.2 |
36.6 |
52.9 |
23.1 |
|
Compounds |
1 % Rec. |
2 % Rec. |
3 % Rec. |
4 % Rec. |
5 % Rec. |
6 % Rec. |
Avg. |
SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,3,7,8-TCDF |
94.0 |
91.8 |
115 |
85.1 |
91.4 |
86.9 |
94.1 |
10.9 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF |
94.2 |
92.7 |
100 |
84.2 |
81.2 |
78.8 |
88.6 |
8.46 |
|
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF |
101 |
96.0 |
105 |
85.8 |
87.3 |
83.3 |
93.0 |
8.82 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF |
80.5 |
81.5 |
111 |
80.0 |
84.0 |
86.5 |
87.3 |
12.0 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF |
79.6 |
80.4 |
108 |
78.1 |
81.8 |
82.7 |
85.1 |
11.3 |
|
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF |
82.7 |
85.3 |
115 |
81.3 |
88.1 |
90.6 |
90.5 |
12.4 |
|
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF |
83.5 |
83.1 |
101 |
83.0 |
89.4 |
94.7 |
89.2 |
7.55 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF |
71.9 |
70.0 |
97.3 |
76.7 |
75.5 |
76.1 |
77.9 |
9.85 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF |
83.5 |
83.3 |
113 |
84.7 |
91.0 |
90.5 |
91.0 |
11.3 |
|
OCDF |
96.4 |
87.9 |
124 |
95.0 |
107 |
101 |
102 |
12.5 |
|
2,3,7,8-TCDD |
81.4 |
79.9 |
111 |
75.2 |
89.9 |
85.1 |
87.0 |
12.6 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD |
99.7 |
91.8 |
104 |
77.6 |
88.2 |
82.9 |
90.7 |
10.0 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD |
79.6 |
81.8 |
118 |
81.2 |
86.7 |
87.1 |
89.0 |
14.3 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD |
79.9 |
84.0 |
114 |
79.4 |
85.1 |
85.0 |
88.0 |
13.2 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD |
78.7 |
71.3 |
103 |
73.8 |
76.7 |
81.5 |
80.8 |
11.3 |
|
OCDD |
74.7 |
67.9 |
99.5 |
72.4 |
73.9 |
70.1 |
76.4 |
11.6 |
|
Compounds |
1 % Rec. |
2 % Rec. |
Avg. |
SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,3,7,8-TCDF |
74.2 |
91.7 |
82.95 |
12.4 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF |
78.6 |
87.6 |
83.1 |
6.36 |
|
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF |
70.4 |
85.0 |
77.7 |
10.3 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF |
85.2 |
76.4 |
80.8 |
6.22 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF |
85.3 |
76.2 |
80.75 |
6.43 |
|
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF |
72.6 |
82.9 |
77.75 |
7.28 |
|
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF |
74.6 |
83.0 |
78.8 |
5.94 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF |
70.1 |
52.4 |
61.25 |
12.5 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF |
65.5 |
56.0 |
60.75 |
6.72 |
|
OCDF |
63.6 |
55.0 |
59.3 |
6.08 |
|
2,3,7,8-TCDD |
70.9 |
82.8 |
76.85 |
8.41 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD |
98.6 |
85.0 |
91.8 |
9.62 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD |
75.4 |
79.4 |
77.4 |
2.83 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD |
73.0 |
87.3 |
78.9 |
11.9 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD |
70.0 |
53.3 |
61.65 |
11.8 |
|
OCDD |
69.2 |
36.6 |
52.9 |
23.1 |
|
Compounds |
1 % Rec. |
2 % Rec. |
Avg. |
SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,3,7,8-TCDF |
88.3 |
87.6 |
88.0 |
0.49 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF |
71.3 |
69.2 |
70.3 |
1.48 |
|
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF |
81.6 |
77.6 |
79.6 |
2.83 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF |
76.9 |
74.5 |
75.7 |
1.70 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF |
75.5 |
72.5 |
74.0 |
2.12 |
|
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF |
86.1 |
84.8 |
85.5 |
0.92 |
|
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF |
86.7 |
81.9 |
84.3 |
3.39 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF |
54.8 |
48.0 |
51.4 |
4.81 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF |
75.8 |
55.8 |
65.8 |
14.1 |
|
OCDF |
79.3 |
28.1 |
53.7 |
36.2 |
|
2,3,7,8-TCDD |
91.8 |
91.9 |
91.9 |
0.07 |
|
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD |
79.5 |
81.1 |
80.3 |
1.13 |
|
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD |
85.1 |
85.8 |
85.5 |
0.49 |
|
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD |
79.5 |
84.6 |
82.1 |
3.61 |
|
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD |
64.7 |
60.1 |
62.4 |
3.25 |
|
OCDD |
61.2 |
54.9 |
58.1 |
4.45 |
The use of an automated extraction system equipped with SPE disk technology yielded acceptable recoveries with particulate- laden water samples without the means of another extraction apparatus such as SDS (Soxhlet/Dean-Stark extractor).
Automated SPE extractions provide a fast method of extracting tetra through octa- chlorinated dioxins and furans from water matrices with analytical sensitivities to ppt (ng/L) levels.
Future work on these compounds will involve the extraction of larger volumes of samples (1 L or greater) using the EZ Flow Disk Holder. These studies will enable the analysis of samples with heavy particulate matter to be processed in a timely and efficient manor while lowering detection limits to the range of ppq (pg/L).
|
Solvent |
Volume (mL) |
Saturate (sec) |
Soak (sec) |
Waste Destination |
Drain (sec) |
|
Methylene Chloride |
15 |
1 |
60 |
Organic |
120 |
|
Acetone |
11 |
1 |
60 |
Organic |
120 |
|
Methanol |
11 |
1 |
60 |
Organic |
8 |
|
Reagent Water |
15 |
1 |
5 |
Organic |
4 |
|
Reagent Water |
15 |
1 |
0 |
Aqueous |
0 |
Literature number: AN112