The purpose of this application note is to outline an automated extraction method utilizing the Atlantic® HLB-M SPE Disk and Biotage automated and manual SPE solutions for the extraction of pharmaceuticals in water. The first section will highlight the use
of the Biotage® Horizon 5000 fully automated extraction system and the method used for this application. Additionally, there will be an Application Modification section that will highlight the use of the Biotage® Horizon 4790 (with data and discussion) and Biotage® VacMaster™ Disk for this application.
The analytical challenge of measuring emerging contaminants in the environment has been a major research focus of scientists for the last 20 years. Water quality is a critical issue especially for sustainable socioeconomic development. Anthropogenic activities are one of the main causes for water quality damage and, consequently, social concern calls for quality control action. Even after water treatment, it has been demonstrated in many studies that organic contaminants escape conventional wastewater treatment processes, and they end up in aquatic systems.
Pharmaceuticals and personal care products are an important group of contaminants that have been targeted, especially in the last decades. For example, EPA Method 16941, published in December 2007, is a guiding and screening method for those scientists analyzing pharmaceuticals in environmental samples. The standard EPA protocol uses solid phase extraction (SPE) for water samples followed by the analysis of extracts by tandem mass spectrometry using a single transition for each compound, with retention time guidelines for identification.
Contaminants are usually present in the environmental samples at very low concentration levels (ng/L) and, for this reason, solid phase extraction techniques are often used to isolate and pre-concentrate the organic compounds of interest. This has led to the development of a method for low concentration level analysis of pharmaceuticals in drinking water samples. The implementation for this method consists of the analysis of 20 analytes which are some of the most common contaminants found in the environment.
Figure 1: Biotage® Horizon 5000.
Figure 2: TurboVap® .
» Biotage Instruments
» Biotage® Horizon 5000 Automated Extraction System
» Atlantic® HLB-M SPE Disk
» TurboVap® Automated Solvent Evaporation System
» Agilent
» 1200 HPLC and 6220 LC-TOF-MS
» Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 Cartridge
|
Step |
Select Solvent |
Volume (mL) |
Purge (s) |
Vacuum |
Saturate (s) |
Soak (s) |
Drain/Elute (s) |
Sample Delay (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Reagent Water |
20 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
|
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Methanol |
20 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
|
|
Wash Sample Container |
Reagent Water |
20 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
|
|
Elute Sample Container |
Methanol |
20 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
|
Step |
Select Solvent |
Volume (mL) |
Purge (s) |
Vacuum |
Saturate (s) |
Soak (s) |
Drain/ Elute (s) |
Sample Delay (s) |
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Acetone |
11 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
30 |
30 |
|
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Acetone |
11 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
30 |
30 |
|
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Reagent water |
15 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
4 |
|
|
Condition SPE Disk |
Reagent water |
15 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
4 |
|
|
Load Sample |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Air Dry Disk |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
Elute Sample Container |
Acetone |
8 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
180 |
40 |
|
|
Elute Sample Container |
Dichloromethane |
8 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
180 |
40 |
|
|
Elute Sample Container |
Dichloromethane |
8 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
40 |
|
|
Elute Sample Container |
Dichloromethane |
8 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
60 |
120 |
|
The separation of the analytes was carried out using an HPLC system equipped with a reversed phase C8 analytical cartridge of 150 mm x 4.6 mm and 5 µm particle size. Cartridge temperature was maintained at 25 °C. The injected sample volume was 50 µL. Mobile phases A and B were acetonitrile and water with 0.1% formic acid, respectively. The optimized chromatographic method held the initial mobile phase composition (10% A) constant for 5 min, followed by a linear gradient to 100% A after 30 min. The flowrate used was 0.6 mL/min. A 10 min post-run time was used after each analysis. This HPLC system was connected to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer Agilent 6220 MSD TOF equipped with a dual electrospray source, operating in positive ion mode, using the following operation parameters: capillary voltage: 4000 V; nebulizer pressure: 45 psig; drying gas: 9 L/min; gas temperature: 300 °C; fragmentor voltage: 190 V; skimmer voltage: 60 V; octopole RF: 250 V.
Biotage would like to thank E. Michael Thurman and Imma Ferrer of the Center for Environmental Mass Spectrometry at the University of Colorado in Boulder for their assistance in developing this method.
|
Step |
Solvent |
Soak Time (s) |
Dry Time (s) |
|
Prewet 1 |
Reagent Water |
0 |
15 |
|
Prewet 2 |
Methanol |
0 |
15 |
|
Wash 1 |
Reagent Water |
0 |
15 |
|
Rinse 1 |
Methanol |
0 |
15 |
|
Step |
Solvent |
Soak Time (s) |
Dry Time (s) |
|
Prewet 1 |
Acetone |
30 |
15 |
|
Prewet 2 |
Acetone |
30 |
15 |
|
Prewet 3 |
Reagent Water |
10 |
2 |
|
Prewet 4 |
Reagent Water |
10 |
2 |
|
Sample Process |
|
|
|
|
Air Dry |
|
|
30 |
|
Rinse 1 |
Acetone |
180 |
20 |
|
Rinse 2 |
Methylene Chloride |
180 |
20 |
|
Rinse 3 |
Methylene Chloride |
60 |
20 |
|
Rinse 4 |
Methylene Chloride |
60 |
20 |
|
Rinse 5 |
Methylene Chloride |
60 |
60 |
The extracts were analysed by LC-TOF-MS. The compounds were chromatographically separated and detected by accurate mass measurements. The recoveries and relative standard deviations (RSD) for the selected pharmaceuticals are within EPA’s 1694 method criteria for precision and recovery. The results for three replicates are presented in Table 5 and a sample chromatogram for the compounds is given in Figure below.
|
Analyte |
Use |
Average Recovery (%) |
RSD (%) |
|
Acetaminophen |
Non-steroidal anti inflammatory |
65 |
8 |
|
Albuterol |
Bronchodilator |
79 |
5 |
|
Atenolol |
Antihypertensive |
86 |
3 |
|
Caffeine |
Cardiac and respiratory stimulant |
66 |
5 |
|
Carbamazepine |
Anticonvulsant/Antidepressant |
101 |
2 |
|
Cotinine |
Antidepressant |
86 |
5 |
|
DEET |
Mosquito repellant |
89 |
6 |
|
Dehydronifedipine |
Antihypertensive |
91 |
5 |
|
Diclofenac |
Anti-inflammatory |
88 |
9 |
|
Diltiazem |
Antihypertensive |
71 |
8 |
|
Diphenhydramine |
Antihistamine |
76 |
5 |
|
Gemfibrozil |
Non-steroidal anti inflammatory |
101 |
2 |
|
Ibuprofen |
Non-steroidal anti inflammatory |
108 |
5 |
|
Lamotrigine |
Antidepressant |
95 |
3 |
|
Metoprolol |
Antihypertensive |
73 |
5 |
|
Naproxen |
Non-steroidal anti inflammatory |
110 |
7 |
|
Sulfadimethoxine |
Antibiotic |
85 |
5 |
|
Sulfamethoxazole |
Antibiotic |
46 |
8 |
|
Triclocarban |
Antiseptic |
65 |
5 |
|
Trimethoprim |
Antibacterial |
83 |
3 |
Figure 3: LC-TOF-MS chromatogram of a spiked tap water sample after extraction with the Biotage® Horizon 4790.
The results demonstrated that the Biotage® Horizon 4790 using Atlantic® HLB-M disks can effectively extract pharmaceutical compounds from 1 L water samples in approximately 40 minutes. This system allows you to use the original sample bottle which will be rinsed with all of the extraction solvents before the elution step. This rinsing step ensures that all the compounds are rinsed off the glass and retained on the disk.
|
Solvent |
Volume (mL) |
Saturate (sec) |
Soak (sec) |
Waste Destination |
Drain (sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Acetone |
11 |
1 |
30 |
Organic |
30 |
|
Acetone |
11 |
1 |
30 |
Organic |
30 |
|
Reagent Water |
15 |
1 |
10 |
Organic |
4 |
|
Reagent Water |
15 |
1 |
10 |
Aqueous |
4 |
|
Solvent |
Volume (mL) |
Saturate (sec) |
Soak (sec) |
Waste Destination |
Elute (sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Acetone |
8 |
1 |
180 |
Organic |
40 |
|
Methylene |
8 |
1 |
180 |
Organic |
40 |
|
Methylene Chloride |
8 |
1 |
60 |
Organic |
40 |
|
Methylene |
8 |
1 |
60 |
Organic |
40 |
Literature number: AN080-HOR