Extraction of a full suite of semi volatile compounds from drinking water using automated solid phase extraction

By Biotage

Introduction


Drinking water is an important part of environmental exposure, especially for small children. Countries around the world have put regulations in place to monitor drinking water quality for a wide range of hazardous compounds. Methods such as SL 392- 2007 in China, the EN methods in Europe and US methods such as method 525.2 cover a large suite of analytes of concern, extracted using solid phase extraction (SPE) disks and using GC/MS for detection.
 
US EPA method 525.2 may use solid phase extraction (SPE) to extract the analytes of interest from water samples. It includes a variety of quality control measures to ensure the method is under control throughout the analysis.1 The Biotage® Horizon 5000 (previously known as SPE-DEX 5000) was used in this study to extract the EPA Method 525.2 analytes from six prepared water samples as described in section 9.3, Initial Demonstration of Laboratory Accuracy and Precision. The test involves measuring 4-7 samples of reagent water spiked at approximately the mid-point of the calibration curve, 2-5 μg/L of the full suite of analytes. For each analyte and surrogate, the spike recovery, expressed as a percentage of the true value, should be 70–130% and the relative standard deviation (RSD) should be <30% to meet method criteria. All six samples were
extracted using the same procedure and calibration parameters.

  •  Biotage
    » Biotage® Horizon 5000 (previously
    known as SPE-DEX 5000)
    » DryVap™* Automated In-line drying and concentration system
    » Drydisk® Separation membranes
    » Atlantic® C18 High Capacity Disk

The Biotage® Horizon 5000 was used for extraction of the analytes from the water samples. The Biotage® Horizon 5000 is an automated system that conditions the solid phase extraction disk, loads the sample through the disk, rinses the sample bottle and elutes the sample all without user intervention. The 47 mm disk holder was used and high capacity C18 disks were chosen. High capacity disks were used because some of the more water soluble compounds are better retained and suffer less breakthrough with this disk. Ethyl acetate and methylene chloride were used for elution.



*The DryVap™ system has been discontinued. We recommend using the TurboVap® evaporation systems for achieving equivalent results.

biotage-an114-figure1-Biotage®-Horizon-5000

Figure 1: Biotage® Horizon 5000 (previously known as SPE-DEX 5000) Automated Extractor

 

The method run on the Biotage® Horizon 5000 is shown in Table 1. The method information, run time, sample identification and other information are stored in a file when the sample is run. This can be printed in a report or exported to the laboratory LIMS for archiving.


Method summary


1. Obtain six 1 litre samples of drinking water.

2. Add dechlorinating agent to each 1 litre sample.

3. Acidify each 1 litre water sample to pH <2 using concentrated HCl.

4. Add surrogate and internal standard compounds into samples.

5. Start extraction method shown in Table 1 and collect extract (≈32 mL).

6. Add extract to the DryDisk® holder and start automated drying and concentration process on the DryVap™ system (the DryVap™ system automatically dries and concentrates extract to 0.9 mL).

7. Quantitatively bring extract volume to 1.0 mL using methy- lene chloride once the extracts are evaporated to less than 1 mL.

8. Add external standard into the 1 mL extract.

9. Transfer the extract to a 2.0 mL GC vial.

10. Analyze by GC/MS.

Gas chromatography mass spectrometry system

Cartridge ZB Semi-volatiles, 30 m x 0.35 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness (Phenomenex)

Flow Rate 9 psig helium ramped up with the oven temperature to maintain a constant flow

Temperature Ramp

Temperature (°C)

Rate (°C/min)

Hold (min)

60

0

2.00

270

20

0.00

320

6

3.00

 

The GC/MS used was a 6890 GC with a 5973 MSD (Agilent).

Total Run Time: 23.83 minutes


Injection Method: 1.0 µL injected, Temperature 280oC , Pulsed splitless
• Inlet pulse pressure 25.0 psi for 1.00 min
• Purge flow to split vent 50 mL/min for @2.00 min

Results and discussions


Six replicate laboratory fortified blanks (LFBs) were extracted as described in US EPA Method 525.2, following the procedure in the method summary in this note. Drinking water was spiked with standards and surrogates at a concentration of 5 μg/L.
The results are shown in Table 2 for each of the six replicate samples.

 

 

Compound

Sample 1

(% Rec)

Sample 2

(% Rec)

Sample 3

(% Rec)

Sample 4

(% Rec)

Sample 5

(% Rec)

Sample 6

(% Rec)

 

AVG

 

SD

Acenaphthene d10

70.0

73.0

77.6

81.0

75.0

76.8

75.6

3.82

Phenanthrene d10

75.6

84.2

88.0

95.4

84.4

85.8

85.6

6.41

Chrysene d12

77.0

83.8

90.2

98.2

84.0

86.0

86.5

7.14

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

113

112

109

110

112

109

111

1.60

2,6-Dinitrotoluene

113

112

108

109

113

107

110

2.75

2-Nitro-m-xylene

95.6

95.6

90.0

87.0

98.0

94.6

93.5

4.12

4,4'-DDD

94.4

93.8

94.0

90.4

94.0

93.6

93.4

1.48

4,4'-DDE

91.4

89.8

92.8

87.2

90.4

89.6

90.2

1.88

4,4-DDT

94.4

93.8

94.0

90.4

94.0

93.6

93.4

1.48

a-BHC

99.2

95.2

97.8

93.8

98.4

96.6

96.8

2.05

Acenaphthene

110

109

101

105

109

106

107

3.28

Acenaphthylene

95.6

95.6

93.8

90.2

98.0

97.0

95.0

2.76

 

 

Compound

Sample 1

(% Rec)

Sample 2

(% Rec)

Sample 3

(% Rec)

Sample 4

(% Rec)

Sample 5

(% Rec)

Sample 6

(% Rec)

 

AVG

 

SD

Acetochlor

108

109

104

103

107

108

106

2.24

a-Chlordane

92.8

91.4

93.4

88.8

93.0

92.0

91.9

1.68

Alachlor

99.8

97.0

99.0

95.2

98.8

98.4

98.0

1.67

Aldrin

85.0

81.6

84.6

81.2

82.4

83.6

83.1

1.58

Ametryn

98.6

95.2

96.8

93.8

98.0

96.4

96.5

1.77

Atrazine

104

98.0

100

96.6

98

100

99.4

2.47

b-BHC

99.0

96.8

98.6

96.0

99.6

97.0

97.8

1.43

Benz(a)anthracene

89.2

87.6

89.0

85.4

88.6

88.8

88.1

1.44

Benzo(a)pyrene

73.8

74.0

76.2

70.4

74.8

75.4

74.1

2.02

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

95.0

93.8

95.4

89.0

92.0

92.0

92.9

2.38

Benzo(ghi)perylene

95.0

93.0

95.2

91.4

93.0

93.2

93.5

1.42

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

91.0

88.8

91.8

89.0

92.2

92.4

90.9

1.60

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate

95.4

92.6

93.4

90.8

94.4

94.2

93.5

1.61

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

96.0

94.0

95.0

92.4

94.8

95.4

94.6

1.26

Bromacil

105

103

104

100

104

102

103

1.86

Butaclor

98.0

98.4

97.6

92.6

100

97.4

97.4

2.54

Butyl benzyl phthalate

100

99.0

98.6

93.4

101

99.0

98.5

2.65

Butylate

103

101

101

97.0

104

101

101

2.44

Caffeine

82.4

88.8

77.2

78.0

84.8

79.0

81.7

4.51

Chlorobenzilate

101

101

99.2

95.4

104

102

100

2.85

Chloroneb

112

110

114

111

113

109

111

1.81

Chlorothalonil

107

105

106

101

107

105

105

2.00

Chlorpropham

125

122

119

122

122

121

122

1.90

Chlorpyrifos

101

95.0

101

96.2

98.6

98.2

98.3

2.41

Chrysene

92.8

90.8

92.8

89.2

91.8

91.6

91.5

1.36

cis-Permethrin

97.8

96.4

96.4

94.4

95.8

96.0

96.1

1.10

Cyanazine

104

99.4

101

98.2

101

100

101

1.94

Cycloate

113

111

110

110

113

110

111

1.46

Dacthal

99.0

96.4

98.6

95.2

99.6

97.8

97.8

1.68

d-BHC

99.6

97.6

101

96.0

100.2

97.4

98.6

1.83

Diazinon

92.8

89.8

90.2

88.0

91.6

91.0

90.6

1.65

Dibenz(ah)anthracene

92.2

91.6

92.2

92.8

91.6

95.6

92.7

1.51

Dichlorvos

119

115

110

112

119

115

115

3.57

Dieldrin

95.6

95.2

95.0

90.2

95.8

93.6

94.2

2.12

Diethyl phthalate

115

114

113

112

114

111

113

1.52

Dimethoate

81.0

90.0

72.8

77.2

82.2

80.0

80.5

5.72

Dimethyl phthalate

109

107

107

106

109

105

107

1.41

 

 

Compound

Sample 1

(% Rec)

Sample 2

(% Rec)

Sample 3

(% Rec)

Sample 4

(% Rec)

Sample 5

(% Rec)

Sample 6

(% Rec)

 

AVG

 

SD

Di-n-butyl phthalate

101

98.8

100

95.0

99.6

98.2

98.9

2.18

Di-n-octyl phthalate

99.6

96.0

98.6

94.8

97.6

97.4

97.3

1.73

Diphenamid

101

98.0

98.8

95.4

100

97.6

98.5

2.01

Disulfoton

96.4

92.8

96.2

91.8

97.4

97.4

95.3

2.42

Disulfoton sulfone

102

103

99.6

97.4

105

102

102

2.68

Endosulfan I

97.8

92.8

97.0

93.4

97.0

93.4

95.2

2.26

Endosulfan II

96.6

97.6

98.8

92.2

98.6

95.2

96.5

2.49

Endosulfan Sulfate

99.2

99.8

98.8

95.4

101

100

99.1

2.04

Endrin

115

111

110

105

114

111

111

3.47

Endrin Aldehyde

88.8

88.4

84.4

81.6

89.4

84.8

86.2

3.10

Endrin Ketone

97.6

97.6

98.8

91.8

101

98.2

97.5

3.11

EPTC

107

104

99.4

99.4

107

104

103

3.35

Ethoprop

119

119

112

116

118

115

117

2.66

Etridiazole

107

107

105

103

110

106

106

2.41

Fenamiphos

116

119

108

109

119

117

115

5.09

Fenarimol

104

104

96.6

96.8

102

103

101

3.31

Fluoranthene

98.2

95.2

97.8

93.8

96.6

95.2

96.1

1.70

Fluorene

104

104

102

100

105

103

103

1.78

Fluridone

110

113

103

104

112

110

109

3.97

g-Chlordane

90.6

89.4

90.8

88.2

91.4

90.2

90.1

1.14

Heptachlor

96.4

91.0

95.6

92.6

94.2

94.8

94.1

1.99

Heptachlor epoxide A

96.8

92.2

95.2

91.0

93.8

92.4

93.6

2.14

Heptachlor epoxide B

96.2

95.2

98.0

92.6

96.8

94.0

95.5

1.96

Hexachlorobenzene

92.0

87.2

91.0

87.2

89.8

91.0

89.7

2.06

Hexazinone

100

100

98.0

94.6

101

100

99.1

2.47

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

94.0

94.4

95.2

91.0

92.6

93.4

93.4

1.48

Isophorone

109

101

96.6

97.4

107

100

102

5.00

Lindane (g-BHC)

99.4

95.6

99.8

95.2

99.4

96.4

97.6

2.12

Malathion

117

116

108

110

115

117

114

3.91

Merphos

93.4

90.6

104

101

108

108

101

7.39

Methoxychlor

100

99.8

98.6

94.2

99.2

97.8

98.3

2.18

Methyl paraoxon

98.8

97.2

97

93.8

94.6

93.4

95.8

2.17

Metolachlor

102

99.4

100

97

102

99.4

100

1.98

Metribuzin

100

96.4

96.2

94.6

99.4

97

97.3

2.16

Mevinphos

127

124

116

122

126

122

123

3.99

MGK-264-A

96.0

94.6

95.8

92.6

97.2

96.0

95.4

1.59

MGK-264-B

96.0

94.6

95.8

92.6

97.2

96.0

95.4

1.59

 

 

Compound

Sample 1

(% Rec)

Sample 2

(% Rec)

Sample 3

(% Rec)

Sample 4

(% Rec)

Sample 5

(% Rec)

Sample 6

(% Rec)

 

AVG

 

SD

Molinate

111

109

108

107

111

107

109

1.78

Naphthalene

89.6

89.8

86.8

80.2

92.0

90.4

88.1

4.24

Napropamide

102

101

98.6

94.2

103

100

99.8

3.09

Norflurazon

99.6

100

96.8

93.8

102

99.6

98.7

2.89

Pebulate

108

106

104

102

109

105

105

2.64

Pentachlorophenol

106

104

105

102

108

107

105

2.08

Perylene-d12

79.2

78.4

81.4

76.6

79.4

80.6

79.3

1.69

Phenanthrene

97.4

94.2

96.0

91.4

97.4

95.8

95.4

2.28

Prometon

79.2

76.6

79.8

73.4

75.2

77.6

77.0

2.42

Prometryn

99.4

95.6

97.4

94.4

97.8

97.0

96.9

1.75

Pronamide

100

96.6

98.8

95.4

99.4

98.0

98.0

1.75

Propachlor

115

112

112

112

113

110

112

1.54

Propazine

103

100

100

98

101

100

101

1.77

Pyrene

96.2

95.2

95.8

90.8

96.4

95.4

95.0

2.09

Pyrene-d10

95.8

94.6

95.6

90.2

96.8

93.8

94.5

2.33

Simazine

98.8

95.8

98.0

95.0

97.4

94.0

96.5

1.86

Simetryn

99.8

97.0

102

99.6

98.4

102

99.9

2.07

Stirofos

112

111

105

104

114

114

110

4.36

Tebuthiuron

120

121

110

118

120

118

118

3.83

Terbacil

119

117

112

111

118

116

115

3.42

Terbufos

122

114

121

110

113

106

115

6.21

Terbuthylazine

101

98.4

98.0

96.0

99.4

98.0

98.5

1.79

Terbutryn

101

98.4

100

96.2

100.6

99.6

99.3

1.73

Terphenyl-d14

130

119

111

102

119

116

116

9.26

Thiobencarb

101

99.6

95.4

96.8

98.6

99.8

98.6

2.13

trans-Nonachlor

92.6

92.0

92.6

89.4

92.8

91.2

91.8

1.30

trans-Permethrin

94.4

92.0

94.2

90.0

93.2

92.4

92.7

1.63

Triademefon

102

99.4

97.2

92.6

98.6

97.0

97.8

3.18

Tricyclazole

99.6

98.4

88.8

89.6

97.6

95.2

94.9

4.63

Trifluralin

110

108

107

107

108

107

108

1.20

Triphenylphosphate

101

101

99.0

95.0

102

101

99.8

2.57

Vernolate

106

105

101

100

109

104

104

3.22

 

The recoveries are within the 70—130% recovery as specified in the method quality control criteria in all cases for the more than 100 compounds measured. The precision was excellent and the standard deviations ranged for 2-3% for most of the analytes.

 

Conclusion


The Atlantic® high-capacity C18 disks provided excellent recovery of the large suite of compounds extracted in water. The compounds included in the method had excellent performance and an average recovery of 98.8% was achieved with a 5 µg/L spike. The spike recovery criterion of 70–130% was achieved in all cases. The Biotage® Horizon 5000 system provided uniform performance and a hands-off approach to the extraction step. The reproducibility of the six runs was excellent and the average of the standard deviation values was 2.57%. The Atlantic high-capacity C18 disk allowed even more water soluble compounds, such as caffeine, to be successfully retained with good recovery, demonstrating the utility of solid phase extraction. In combination with the Biotage® Horizon, the samples were reliably extracted with excellent precision.


References


1. Method 525.2, Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by Liquid-Solid Extraction and CapillaryCartridge Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, US EPA https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/ files/2015-10/documents/method_525-2_rev-2_1995.pdf, accessed April 12, 2017.

 

Literature number: AN114

Published: Dec 6, 2025 5:45:00 AM

Related literature